
In this high-stakes episode of Acquisitions Anonymous, all four hosts tackle a controversial, intriguing listing: the bankruptcy assets of Infowars, the infamous media company led by Alex Jones.
In this high-stakes episode of Acquisitions Anonymous, all four hosts tackle a controversial, intriguing listing: the bankruptcy assets of Infowars, the infamous media company led by Alex Jones. With humor and insight, the team dives into the unusual opportunity to acquire assets from this high-profile, politically charged brand, including intellectual property, production studios, a vast e-commerce business, and more. They discuss the potential risks, the wild history of Infowars’ reach, and consider how someone might leverage these assets creatively—or if it’s simply too toxic a deal.
This episode is sponsored by Acquisition Lab, the accelerator helping aspiring business buyers with education, tools, and community support. Created by Walker Deibel, author of Buy Then Build, Acquisition Lab offers a vetted cohort-based experience for people ready to navigate the complexities of acquiring a business. Learn more at AcquisitionLab.com.
This breakdown explores:
- The business model of e-commerce for influencers and Infowars’ strategy
- Legal implications of purchasing Infowars' assets
- The high-margin, supplement-heavy e-commerce store driving revenue
- The fascinating idea of repurposing Infowars into a Museum of Conspiracy Theories
- The potential liabilities and limitations of rebranding
Could there be a way to separate the assets from the controversial founder? Tune in to hear the team’s perspectives on one of the wildest deals they’ve covered yet!

In this episode the hosts analyze a tiny niche SaaS serving midwives and doulas with 80% margins but conclude the $400K price is too high given zero growth, easy replication risk, and limited market traction.

In this episode the hosts review an Alabama non-emergency medical transportation business priced around $1.0–1.4M and unanimously reject the deal due to unstable earnings, questionable financial reporting, and heavy dependence on government contracts.

In this episode the hosts evaluate a Miami-based architectural sign manufacturer generating roughly $1.9M in seller earnings, debating whether its attractive 3.3x multiple hides customer concentration risk and heavy dependence on the retiring owners’ relationships.